Are passive control measures considered the most robust approach to hazard control due to their low reliance on human intervention?

Passive control measures are designed to automatically mitigate hazards without the need for active human intervention, which makes them a part of a strong safety strategy. However, stating that they are the most robust approach universally overlooks the complexities involved in different processes and the nature of potential hazards.

In many scenarios, while passive measures can significantly enhance safety, they may not provide adequate risk reduction for all types of hazards. Active controls, which rely on human intervention or active systems, may sometimes be necessary to handle dynamic situations or respond to unforeseen incidents effectively.

Moreover, the robustness of control measures can depend on the specific context of a process or facility. Factors such as the type of process, the nature of the potential hazards, and operational circumstances dictate the appropriateness and effectiveness of any hazard control strategy, whether passive or active. Thus, declaring passive control measures as the definitive most robust approach does not account for these vital nuances, leading to the conclusion that the statement is false.